California Shanty Town
Six outhouses for 350 residents.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
« August 2008 | Main | October 2008 »
Six outhouses for 350 residents.
Moon of Alabama
September 23, 2008 This evolved over the various versions. The original Paulson proposal said:
All media reports and blogs I have read about this assume that the Treasury under this plan would only buy Mortgage Backed Securities, i.e. bonds backed my mortgage payments. But the above language also includes Credit Default Swaps. Insurance contracts or derivatives, that guarantee the recoverability of MBS and change their value in relation to an MBS' value. The language in the Treasury Fact Sheed on the proposal is even wider:
It seems like the fact sheed exceeds the breadth of the released proposal. Oh, you say, the Democrats in Congress will prevent the Treasury from morphing into a investment bank backed by $700 billion of taxpayer capital? Here is Senator Dodd's expanded proposal of the Paulson plan. The language is even worse than in the original:
The Dodd version gets lauded by Krugman, DeLong and other 'liberal' luminaries. This while the bailout language morphed from "mortgage related assets" to "any financial instrument." The Dodd version added some nice little extras for a homeowners in distress and some oversight provision. But it also extended the scope of the Paulson plan far beyond housing and mortgages towards an all encompassing bailout for any financial issue. Since 2003 Dodd collected
over $4 million in contributions from Securities and Investment
companies. His top five doners include Citibank, SAC Capital Partners
and Royal Bank of Scotland. That may well be the reason why he does not
want to keep the bill restricted to mortgage related assets but wants
to include any financial instrument. If this becomes law, Paulson and whoever replaces him in January will have the authority to buy Asset
Backed Securities from car loans and credit card loans. He will be able
to buy and sell derivatives based on ABS that have build in leverage
effects. The Treasury may even deal in synthetic Collateral Debt
Obligations and derivatives base on those. It can buy and sell shares
of public dealt companies, precious metals, future contracts on these
and it can speculate on interest moves of Russian government bonds. Are there any big long future positions on the Canadian dollar the U.S. president does not like? Just get the Treasury buy them up. Congress is giving it the right to do so. With a capital of $700 billion and the authority to buy and sell any highly leveraged financial instruments, the Treasury will become one gigantic hedge fund that can and may well act to move multi-trillions. If such an entity makes one wrong move, it can bankrupt its owners within a few hours. The Treasury is too knowledgeable to make such mistakes? So were two Nobel Price winners at LTCM. |
:: Article nr. 47444 sent on 23-sep-2008 19:39 ECT
www.uruknet.info?p=47444
Link: www.moonofalabama.org/2008/09/the-treasury-mo.html
Afshin Rattansi in Tehran talks to Max Keiser in Paris about the end of Wall Street, dollars and toilet paper - and Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs no longer being investment banks...
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL FOR TREASURY AUTHORITY
TO PURCHASE MORTGAGE-RELATED ASSETS
Section 1. Short Title.
This Act may be cited as ____________________.
Sec. 2. Purchases of Mortgage-Related Assets.
(a) Authority to Purchase.--The
Secretary is authorized to purchase, and to make and fund commitments
to purchase, on such terms and conditions as determined by the
Secretary, mortgage-related assets from any financial institution
having its headquarters in the United States.
(b) Necessary Actions.--The
Secretary is authorized to take such actions as the Secretary deems
necessary to carry out the authorities in this Act, including, without
limitation:
(1) appointing such employees as may be required to carry out the authorities in this Act and defining their duties;
(2) entering into contracts,
including contracts for services authorized by section 3109 of title 5,
United States Code, without regard to any other provision of law
regarding public contracts;
(3) designating financial
institutions as financial agents of the Government, and they shall
perform all such reasonable duties related to this Act as financial
agents of the Government as may be required of them;
(4) establishing vehicles that are
authorized, subject to supervision by the Secretary, to purchase
mortgage-related assets and issue obligations; and
(5) issuing such regulations and
other guidance as may be necessary or appropriate to define terms or
carry out the authorities of this Act.
Sec. 3. Considerations.
In exercising the authorities granted in this Act, the Secretary shall take into consideration means for--
(1) providing stability or preventing disruption to the financial markets or banking system; and
(2) protecting the taxpayer.
Sec. 4. Reports to Congress.
Within three months of the first
exercise of the authority granted in section 2(a), and semiannually
thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the Committees on the Budget,
Financial Services, and Ways and Means of the House of Representatives
and the Committees on the Budget, Finance, and Banking, Housing, and
Urban Affairs of the Senate with respect to the authorities exercised
under this Act and the considerations required by section 3.
Sec. 5. Rights; Management; Sale of Mortgage-Related Assets.
(a) Exercise of Rights.--The
Secretary may, at any time, exercise any rights received in connection
with mortgage-related assets purchased under this Act.
(b) Management of Mortgage-Related
Assets.--The Secretary shall have authority to manage mortgage-related
assets purchased under this Act, including revenues and portfolio risks
therefrom.
(c) Sale of Mortgage-Related
Assets.--The Secretary may, at any time, upon terms and conditions and
at prices determined by the Secretary, sell, or enter into securities
loans, repurchase transactions or other financial transactions in
regard to, any mortgage-related asset purchased under this Act.
(d) Application of Sunset to
Mortgage-Related Assets.--The authority of the Secretary to hold any
mortgage-related asset purchased under this Act before the termination
date in section 9, or to purchase or fund the purchase of a
mortgage-related asset under a commitment entered into before the
termination date in section 9, is not subject to the provisions of
section 9.
Sec. 6. Maximum Amount of Authorized Purchases.
The Secretary's authority to
purchase mortgage-related assets under this Act shall be limited to
$700,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time
Sec. 7. Funding.
For the purpose of the authorities
granted in this Act, and for the costs of administering those
authorities, the Secretary may use the proceeds of the sale of any
securities issued under chapter 31 of title 31, United States Code, and
the purposes for which securities may be issued under chapter 31 of
title 31, United States Code, are extended to include actions
authorized by this Act, including the payment of administrative
expenses. Any funds expended for actions authorized by this Act,
including the payment of administrative expenses, shall be deemed
appropriated at the time of such expenditure.
Sec. 8. Review.
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant
to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency
discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any
administrative agency.
Sec. 9. Termination of Authority.
The authorities under this Act,
with the exception of authorities granted in sections 2(b)(5), 5 and 7,
shall terminate two years from the date of enactment of this Act.
Sec. 10. Increase in Statutory Limit on the Public Debt.
Subsection (b) of section 3101 of
title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking out the dollar
limitation contained in such subsection and inserting in lieu thereof
$11,315,000,000,000.
Sec. 11. Credit Reform.
The costs of purchases of
mortgage-related assets made under section 2(a) of this Act shall be
determined as provided under the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, as
applicable.
Sec. 12. Definitions.
For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) Mortgage-Related Assets.--The
term "mortgage-related assets" means residential or commercial
mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that
are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was
originated or issued on or before September 17, 2008.
(2) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Treasury.
(3) United States.--The term
"United States" means the States, territories, and possessions of the
United States and the District of Columbia.
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of
government.
It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the Public Treasury.
From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the Public Treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy always followed by dictatorship."
- Alexander Fraser Tyler, "The Decline and Fall of
the Athenian Republic
Read the complaint here.
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/Update/Update2008-09-18.htm
On
the day following the 221st anniversary of the
signing of the U.S. Constitution, WTP Chairman and
constitutional activist Robert Schulz today filed a
federal lawsuit in United States District Court in
Albany seeking to halt the execution of the
emergency bailout of American International Group,
Inc. (AIG) by the United States Government and the
Federal Reserve.
The lawsuit asserts that the commitment of public
funds and credit for the direct benefit of privately
owned AIG is an ultra vires action by the United
States Government and Federal Reserve, i.e.,
beyond the limited legal authority granted by the
Constitution. The lawsuit asks for a "show cause"
hearing demanding that the Government produce
evidence of its legal authority to commit public
funds for such a purpose, as well as emergency and
permanent injunctions halting the bailout
transaction.
Beyond the Constitutional deficiencies, the bailout
establishes a dangerous precedent enabling the Fed
and/or Government to nationalize virtually any
business or property within the United States
without legal authority or congressional approval.
The defendants include the Federal Reserve System,
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanki, the U.S. Treasury,
Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson Jr. and the United
States Government.
The
WTP Foundation today issued a
press release citing Schulz:
"Beyond the moral hazard and dangerous precedent
established by this action, it is of vital
importance that the American people recognize that
the present financial crisis is a direct and
predictable result of decades of constitutional
violations by the Federal Government. Through
a long-standing policy of disinformation and
collusion with the Federal Reserve and Wall Street
financial elite, the United States Federal
Government has denied public access to information
about the secretive operations of the privately
owned and operated Federal Reserve and its monopoly
control of America’s money system.
"This monopoly control of our currency by a private banking cartel has resulted in increasing distortion, volatility and cyclical (boom and bust) economic conditions in the U.S. and abroad. America’s fiat currency (produced from thin air) is manipulated by the Federal Reserve for the benefit of its owners, major Wall Street financial institutions and the Federal Government and is not unaccountable to the taxpayers. These abuses of the Constitution have taken our financial system to edge of the abyss. The chickens have come home to roost."
Click here to read the Complaint, the Memorandum of Law supporting the TRO, and Schulz's Declaration which includes several recent articles from the New York Times.
I was adopted by my step-father when I was seventeen. I hadn't known him all that long before my sisters and I were adopted, but he was a good person and much needed in my life at that time. My father was killed a year later, a scene from a bad soap opera. I didn't know that I would receive a trust fund upon his death. He mentioned inheritance a few times, telling us kids would be rich when he was dead. It was an odd thing to say. I knew there was family money, but no other details.
Each month I receive dividends from trust funds that I became heir to upon my father's death. It's enough that I have a little more freedom to say no to bad working conditions, not enough to change my socioeconomic position. It truly is a blessing. I try to do good things with the money.
I am at
odds with PNC
Damn right I have! Just weeks before the implosions of Fannie and Freddie, Lehman Brothers and AIG, their Chief Strategist was telling clients that these market fluctuations were just a result of irrational fear. He even had the audacity to quote Hunter S. Thompson. How I wish I could emulate his prose for this piece. Unfortunately, I don't have the newsletter because my cat left a giant yellow hairball on the paper. Who says animals aren't capable of analysis?
I want to
continue to have a check each month, which is why I want my portfolio liquidate
and be moved into gold stored outside of the United States. That is the most defensive position I can
take in these worthless markets.
The short
of it is that PNC
In essence,
They no
doubt think I am a belligerent buffoon, a Mogambo Guru wannabee incoherently speaking
in manic run on sentences and wildly interrupting them because my head felt
just like the JP Morgan derivatives portfolio. Surely an aneurism was coming on as I paced wildly back in forth across
the back patio of my store, screaming in to the telephone. "I respect your opinion," mocked
the patronizing guy. I wanted to reach
through the satellite signal and slap a pile of cash in front of him and say, "Put
your money where your mouth is. How much
of your own savings do you want to wager on the likely recovery of the U.S.
Instead, I
loudly proclaimed that one of us is right and one of us is wrong and I have a
better track record. Seriously. I have given the bank proposals over the
years that would have made HUGE profits, enough to counteract the years of
damage from lack of oversight and care on the part of PNC.
It took my
bank a year of analysis before deciding not to buy Yahoo because it was trading
to high. In the meantime, we missed 400
percent growth.
Every time they recite their dogma of looking out for my investments and exercising prudence, I want to scream. Sometimes I do scream. In fact, almost nothing upsets me more than dealing with my "free money". It's a gift horse and yet those managing my trust are squandering it away by staying in bad investments and staying in the dollar. Oh, the dollar. That brings back memories of when I asked the bank to put on a euro play back when the euro and dollar were at parity. Wouldn't be prudent. Ten percent ROI per year is not prudent.
I mentioned
that one of our municipal bonds was under water. Bonds are safe because you always have the
value of the bond, said a male.
"What if the municipality goes bankrupt?"
"You always have the value of the bond."
"Not
if they are bankrupt. There have already
been defaults on municipals. Some states
are bankrupt. Florida
If you
could only hear the patronizing sighs of the participants. Here this little trust fund baby was telling
these fancy drones that municipal bonds weren't backed by anything. But it's true. As I said in an earlier letter to Kelly
Jelly, my Investment Advisor who parrots the PNC
No response. Imagine my surprise.
In a few
months, the State of Florida
The PNC
We talk
about gold. It's speculative they
say. Traditionally it's been called a
safe haven, and The Times refers to it as such today. PNC
Someone
says using my logic, they should go out and buy a silo of grain and whole up
for Armageddon. Thank the dog he was
3000 miles away because I just wanted to bitch slap him. Gold is not speculative. Gold is not grain. Gold has been used as currency for thousands
of years. A silo of grain is useless
after a year. A silo of gold ensures
that you will rule the world. I hope
that asshole is the first to lose his job. I hope he has to pay huge alternative minimum tax on worthless stock
options from his lousy bank that deserves to go under.
I want to
scream. Not only do I want to scream,
but I want to scream obscenities because any banker who believes we are not
headed for a Depression is a fucking idiot. Yes, I have gone and insulted just about everyone I spoke with on the
phone, because obviously I do not value their opinions. I might value their opinions if they had been
able to back up their statements regarding the health and recovery of the U.S.
This is my
frustration. I suggest something that
will make the trust money and the bank says no. Then the bank turns around and loses money on trades.
I did end
up resorting to profanity, but it was seriously unavoidable. You see, there are no stops on my
stocks. Not one. And there is no one monitoring my
account. We went a year without an
investment advisor overseeing the account! I am pretty sure that is a huge breech of fiduciary responsibility.
I asked what would happen if the market crashed and there were no stops.
No
answer. Is this prudent? You have no one monitoring the accounts, no
stops and so what happens when AIG
We do not
need stops because the stock market is not going to crash. I repeat, the stock market is not going to
crash according to the boys at PNC
"What
if you're wrong and the market crashes?" Silence. They were all probably
thinking about their underwater mortgages and the possibility that they would
be looking for a job at a Circle K next year.
"The
market is not going to crash and we have full faith that the U.S.
The good
thing is that PNC
I believe
that there is huge pressure to keep people from liquidating their
portfolios. I was told by one person at PNC
They said
they would stop me from liquidating my account into a cash position. It makes absolutely no sense to stay in a
position when you know the economy is going to sink. Both PNC
So I send
this out as a warning. I want PNC
As an
aside, a friend of ours recently liquidated her U.S.
Something
isn't right here.
I am
posting my emails to the bank on my blog, hoping that their contact PNC
If PNC
These are
the things PNC
The Federal Reserve is broke.
US Treasuries are at risk.
These alarmist headlines come from
the Wall Street Journal.
The Prime Money Market Fund
was open only to institutional investors. Putnam said in a statement that its
board decided to close the fund last night after receiving a large number of
redemption requests. The company said it could honor those requests only by
selling assets at a loss, reducing the value of the remaining shares.
Putnam said it decided
instead to liquidate the fund and spread any losses evenly among all the
investors. "We wanted to treat all shareholders equally," said
spokeswoman Laura McNamara. She said it was "premature" to discuss
how much of a loss, if any, shareholders will incur.
Continue reading "Is your bank keeping you in the markets against your will?" »
September 2, 2008
Fact Versus Speculation
(This essay was written by silver analyst Theodore Butler, an independent consultant. Investment Rarities does not necessarily endorse these views, which may or may not prove to be correct.)
What’s happening in the silver and gold markets is, without a doubt, the most sordid scheme in the history of finance. It makes a mockery of financial regulation and the rule of law. It allows a large financial entity, or entities, to rip off the investing public and gouge them for obscene profits.
It is cronyism, back-room dealing, market fixing and inside information at its worst. I am terribly disappointed and dismayed that such a thing could happen in our great country.
In the following paragraphs I will outline and explain how a major bank or banks, in likely concert with the U.S. government, pulled off financial shenanigans that will literally take your breath away. This is an outrage that cannot be allowed to stand.
The recent revelations in the CFTC’s Bank Participation Report for August provided stunning proof of concentration and manipulation in the COMEX silver and gold futures markets. Two U.S. banks held a short position in COMEX silver futures, as of August 5, of 33,805 contracts, or almost 170 million ounces, an increase of 138 million ounces in one month. That increase is equal to 20% of the world mine production. If one or two entities bought or sold 20% of the annual world production of oil or wheat in a month, it would bring about a congressional feeding frenzy.
In gold, no more than 3 U.S. banks sold short in one month more than 10% of world annual mine production. This was the largest short position in gold and silver ever recorded by U.S. banks. After the massive and concentrated silver and gold short position was established by these U.S. banks, the markets experienced a historic decline in price. It all took place during the first widespread retail silver shortage in history. It is completely at odds how the law of supply and demand works.
The facts are so clear that the CFTC should have provided an immediate explanation as to why this doesn’t constitute manipulation. They should move against the manipulators just as promptly. Silence is not an option. The U.S. banks (or bank) in question are at the top of the financial food chain when it comes to size, power and importance. They are publicly owned by millions of investors. These banks are generally open about their financial dealings, which are closely scrutinized. There is an archaic rule that prevents the CFTC from revealing the identity of these banks. But there is no rule preventing these banks acknowledging they were responsible for these silver and gold short sales and explaining the economic justification behind them. These are material transactions that should be disclosed to their shareholders. Apparently transparency does not apply to manipulative transactions.
One U.S. Bank?
While the report lists two U.S. banks in silver and three in gold, it may be that only one bank, and perhaps the same bank, held the greatest amount of the total short position in silver and gold. The published data is not specific enough, but objective analysis raises the strong probability that just one bank held 30,000 or more short silver contracts (150 million ounces), and 75,000 gold contracts in the current report. What are the odds of two or three banks suddenly deciding to short unprecedented amounts of silver and gold contracts spontaneously? If it were two or three banks it would raise the issue of collusion. If it was just one U.S. bank, it would mean that bank held 34% of the entire COMEX silver market and 30% of the gold market. Such a concentration would be manipulation to any reasonable person.
The Bank Participation Report is a monthly snapshot on a predetermined single date. Therefore, it is unlikely to capture the extreme high or low holdings of participants. Based upon the weekly Commitment of Traders Report (COT) for positions as of July 22, the 4 largest traders, including the big U.S. banks, held a record net short position of 63,740 silver contracts, or 7,779 more contracts than they held for the COT and Bank Participation Reports of 8/5. Thus, it is almost certain that the big U.S. bank(s) held a substantially larger position on 7/22 than it held in the Bank Participation Report of August 5. That would mean the true net percentage of the entire market possibly held by one U.S. bank could be even higher than 34%, and may in fact, exceed 40%. That is truly shocking.
I have a simple solution to determine if what I am suggesting is true. Let the CFTC tell us. I’m not asking them to violate the rule that they and the big traders hide behind, the one that protects the identity of the traders. I’m asking something else entirely. Instead of telling us what two or three U.S. banks held, as they do in the Bank Participation Report, or what the 4 or 8 largest traders may hold, as they do in the COT report, just tell us what the one largest trader held in silver and gold. That will settle the matter. Let them protect the identity, just tell us how many contracts the big U.S. bank held on July 22 and August 5.
This is a perfectly reasonable request. There is no taxpayer cost involved. It will take one employee only a few minutes to determine this. There is no valid reason why the CFTC, in the interest of monitoring concentration and preventing manipulation, should not disclose what the very largest trader in every market held. The CFTC should answer forthwith. If they don’t, we must make them, through our elected representatives. They will try to weasel out of this reasonable request. We can’t let them.
A U.S. Government Silver Intervention?
For many years, I have openly alleged an ongoing manipulation in the silver (and gold) market. As that message became more believable to growing numbers of readers, their feedback indicated that their most popular motive behind the manipulation was some type of U.S. Government involvement. I rejected these "conspiracy" theories, preferring instead my simple explanation of control by big financial firms.
There were a few things I didn’t report on in my previous article, "The Smoking Gun" (By the way, since so many have referred to that article, let me acknowledge and thank Carl Loeb for his valuable contributions to that article.) It wasn’t just that 2 U.S. banks were short almost 34,000 silver futures contracts, as of August 5. It was also that they replaced what the other big financial entities had been short. The key here is the replacement angle. The data in the weekly COTs, and in the monthly Bank Participation Report, confirm this. What does this data mean?
I am going to speculate based upon the known facts. Maybe I will be proven correct, maybe not. However, the nature of this speculation is so disturbing, that I hope I am wrong. But I need to state it because if I am close to the mark, the implications for the silver market are profound.
I think the data in the COT and the Bank Participation Reports indicate that the U.S. Government may have bailed out the biggest COMEX silver short by arranging for a U.S. bank to take over their position. This coincides with JP Morgan’s takeover of Bear Stearns. In fact, it would not surprise me if the bailout was JP Morgan taking over Bear Stearns‘ short silver position, at the government‘s request. While this silver bailout (if it happened) was no doubt undertaken with financial system stability in mind, it has disturbing implications of legality and equity.
JP Morgan has been mentioned as a possible big silver and gold short. If it’s not them, it is someone like them. How many big U.S. banks fit the profile? Certainly, if JP Morgan isn’t one of the big silver or gold shorts, they can instantly dismiss such talk by stating so.
Logically, there would appear to be no way that a big money center U.S. bank would choose this time and place to suddenly decide to short 150 million ounces of silver and 7 million ounces of gold voluntarily. The banks are hemorrhaging losses due to poor quality mortgages and other ill-advised bets. They’ve cut back credit and are circling the wagons. A CEO, like Jamie Dimon, is not going to risk the wrath of shareholders with a massive and dangerous impromptu bet on the short side of precious metals. No bank CEO would, as it is too reckless to contemplate. And no CEO would do it without prior approval from the regulators.
I believe the bank involved did not seek approval, but merely followed the request of the U.S. Government to sell quantities of silver and gold to bailout the former big short. If that former big short bought back this position, we would have seen $50 or $100 silver in a flash. If my speculation is correct, someone in the government wished to prevent that. Worse, the government (most likely Treasury and the Federal Reserve) allowed the new short to further rig the market to the downside with a variety of dirty tricks.
In other words, it was the U.S. Government that arranged and sanctioned the sell-off. That the government might undermine confidence in our markets and sanction manipulation and illegal market behavior for any reason is beyond my understanding. I love this country. But I certainly don’t love our government. Nor do I trust them. What to do about it?
Well, a start is to insist that the CFTC disclose how many contracts the largest trader held short in COMEX silver and gold futures on 7/22 and 8/5. Ask them and ask your elected officials to ask them. I’m including the e-mail addresses of the commissioners and the Inspector General.
Wlukken@cftc.gov
Mdunn@cftc,gov
Bchilton@cftc.gov
Jsommers@cftc.gov
Alavik@cftc.gov
Now that the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group is the new owner of the NYMEX/COMEX, they should be notified of the alleged manipulation and also asked to provide the number of contracts held net short by the largest short position holder on 7/22 and 8/5. I’m including the e-mail address of the Chief Regulatory Officer. Dean.payton@cmegroup.com
If my speculation is close to the mark that the U.S. Government is now involved in the silver manipulation, does this mean the manipulation can be extended indefinitely? In my opinion, the answer is no. In the end, what will terminate the manipulation will be a lack of adequate wholesale supplies of silver to the industrial users. It’s similar to what is now happening in the retail market. Uncle Sam does not have any silver, and is powerless to secretly subsidize the users. Additionally, the government is more subject to scrutiny than others. The single inevitable solution to this manipulation is higher prices; sharply higher prices.
What I’ve explained here, if true, cannot be condoned for any reason. It’s illegal and contrary to everything that America stands for.
9/4/2008
by John Rubino
Gene Arensberg, Resource Investor
Everyone can look at the data and form their own conclusions. But when silver is in short physical supply, commanding injuriously high premiums and difficult to locate; when investors are piling into the silver ETF in droves, a 40% silver price plunge is not only not warranted, it smells.
It is difficult to imagine a legitimate reason that two U.S. banks could quickly and systematically amass a net short position on the COMEX which amounts to over a quarter of the entire action on that bourse. It will not be surprising at all if we learn that these two U.S. banks are taken to task by regulators for their actions. It will be even less surprising to learn that they have become the target of multi-billion dollar class action lawsuits by hungry lawyers representing silver investors everywhere.
Futures markets are supposed to answer the actual physical markets, not the other way around. In other words, futures markets are supposed to be a place where producers or large holders of a commodity can lay off price risk to speculators and thereby hedge against unforeseen adverse movements in the price of the commodity. Futures markets are definitely not supposed to be a place where a couple of well connected and well funded entities can bully the market with their own heavy handed trading.
If silver really was just taken down by a couple of very big U.S. banks to irrationally low levels, it won’t be long before the laws of supply and demand reassert themselves. Got silver?
Frank Barbera, Gold Stock Technician
Even more to that point, we wonder at what point does an institution such as the Fed lose its credibility? At what point does an institution become irrelevant? The answer to that question is when events have taken on a life of their own, and when their words no longer have any real impact. We have fortunately not reached this point yet, but for all appearances seem to be heading in this direction at a rapid pace. The socialization of financial market bad debts has forced the Fed to act as the lender of last resort, placing its own balance sheet on the line for the ineptitudes which were sewn over so many years of the Greenspan Fed. How dare Mr. Greenspan comment on perils of the current collapse when he was the chief architect of the events now unfolding each and every week.
Bob Chapman, International Forecaster
Why should gold go down if the dollar goes up? If the dollar goes up substantially, that means the euro is going down substantially, so gold should be exploding in the Euro Zone. If anything, a weaker euro should be more supportive of gold than a weaker dollar as there are just as many euros out there as there are dollars now, and because the people of Europe are far more attuned to the uses and purposes of precious metals than are their US counterparts. We sure hope the people in the Euro Zone loaded up on precious metals, which are now skyrocketing in their currency as the euro has gone from 1.60 dollars to 1.50 dollars in rather rapid succession. All fiat currencies will continue to lose against gold, including the dollar, so it is time to load up on the bargains you have been so graciously gifted with by your evil government and the Wall Street fraudsters!!!
Another scheme that financial companies have employed during the crisis is to regularly reclassify assets from Level 2 to Level 3 and vice versa. Level 3 assets have no market so values have to be guessed. Level 2 assets are ‘marked by model according to tangible data.’ Ergo if you have a beneficial model you move assets from Level 3 to Level 2 to generate better marks and earnings.
Which leads us to JP Morgan – For most of the US financial crisis the media and pundits hailed JP Morgan as having a ‘fortress-like balance sheet’ even though it has over $80 trillion of derivatives. JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon has been portrayed as the Financial Wizard of Oz.
So for the past several months most investors and people assumed that JP Morgan somehow managed to avoid all the crappy paper and ancillary problems that plague the industry. One group that thought otherwise averred that the Bear Stearns bailout was engineered to help JP Morgan obfuscate its problems and borrow massively from the Fed without public concern.
But the revelation of a relatively miniscule $1.5B write-down has destroyed the illusion of JP Morgan’s imperviousness to the financial mess. This has led analysts, investors and wise guys to re-examine JPM.
One disconcerting JPM fundamental is the amount of its Level 2 assets. An astute money manager alerted us that, “The market is obsessed with Level 3 assets levels but forgot to notice that of JPM's total $1.775 trillion in assets, $1.575 trillion are Level 2 or mark to model. The whole loan, MBS and Level 2 are what presents the real danger when the raters finally get there.”
Gary Dorsch, Global Money Trends
Trading in foreign currencies is akin to judging a reverse beauty contest, and suddenly, the US-dollar's was looking a little less ugly than its peers.
Ambrose Evans-Prichard, Telegraph UK
My guess is that political protest will mark the next phase of this drama. Almost half a million people have lost their jobs in Spain alone over the last year. At some point, the feeling of national impotence in the face of monetary rule from Frankfurt will erupt into popular fury. The ECB will swallow its pride and opt for a weak euro policy, or face its own destruction.
What we are about to see is a race to the bottom by the world's major currencies as each tries to devalue against others in a beggar-thy-neighbor policy to shore up exports, or indeed simply because they have to cut rates frantically to stave off the consequences of debt-deleveraging and the risk of an outright Slump. When that happens - if it is not already happening - it will become clear that the both pillars of the global monetary system [the dollar and the euro] are unstable, infested with the dry rot of excess debt.
Gold bugs, you ain't seen nothing yet. Gold at $800 looks like a bargain in the new world currency disorder.
Bill Fleckenstein, Fleckenstein Capital
In any case, if we saw (as it appeared) heavy selling or short-selling in the futures market while demand for gold in the physical world was rising, that historically would be a very bullish development.
What does seem quite clear is that some portion of gold's weakness has been a function of the dollar's strength. The dollar's violent rally owes to folks' beliefs that the economy is improving in the U.S., that the Federal Reserve intends to raise interest rates and that the rest of the world economy is slowing down.
The rest of the world may in fact be slowing down. But our economy is not about to get better, and the Fed is not about to tighten rates. Just the thought of the Fed increasing rates is laughable.
Eric Janszen, iTulip
The current recession is more serious than all previous recessions since the early 1980s. This time inflation, unemployment, and a credit crunch are cutting into demand. Demand, in the economic sense, is the combined desire of consumers to spend and the availability of the cash they need to act on that desire. Recessions with declining demand tend to be self-reinforcing as falling demand leads to falling consumption leading businesses to reduce labor costs by laying off employees, leading to falling incomes and further reductions in demand.
Another unusual aspect of this recession is that traditional Keynesian techniques to stimulate demand by expanding credit through interest rates cuts is hobbled by a moribund housing market; housing has for decades been the primary mechanism for transmitting interest cuts to consumers by reducing a household's primary interest expense, their mortgage. The freed up money acts much like tax cut. Now, however, interest rates are rising, especially for those homeowners who took Greenspan's advice in 2005 and took out an adjustable rate mortgage when fixed rate mortgages were at 40 year lows, and tightening lending standards are cutting off home mortgage refinancing for millions.
Finally, a weak dollar since 2001 means "oil prices drive up the cost of everything that requires oil to grow, be dug up, blown, packed, scrubbed, crushed, shaken, warmed, cooled, pickled, packaged, processed, or moved – that is, everything on God’s green earth including your own hair and the hot water you used to wash it this morning." The only way to reduce that impact short term is to use less oil. A recession will help, as long as the dollar doesn't fall faster than oil demand.
Jack Lifton, Resource Investor
As the 2008 political season nears its quadrennial crescendo and rock stars and war heroes are vying to be selected for the most militarily powerful job in the world it would seem that no one, certainly no politician, is willing to admit that America’s world economic-leadership is eroding at an almost perceptible daily rate. Candidates, and office holders, remind us that each of the U.S. Navy’s 12 carrier battle-groups is, by itself, more powerful than any other single nation’s entire navy! Yet they fail to mention that we cannot build armoured ships or vehicles, small arms, artillery, armour piercing ammunition, missile guidance, night vision equipment, computers, displays, or, believe it or not, nuclear propulsion systems, or aircraft of any kind, civilian or military, without minor metals, such as the rare earths. Most of which we are now, 100%, dependent on nations unfriendly to America, which, notwithstanding their being unfriendly, already practice resource nationalism. Some of them, such as China, have already openly begun to restrict the export — or utilization for items for export—of key industrial minor metals, so as to reinforce their own self sufficiency in these materials.
Bob Moriarty, 321Gold
Homestake declined about 21% from the crash in late October 1929 through the end of that year, but through the entire decade of the 1930s Homestake was the highest gaining stock on the New York Stock Exchange. So, it’s entirely possible the market could crash and gold stocks go up. At some point in time, people are going to recognize the precious metals stocks, not all metal stocks, are the safest place to be.
Doug Noland, Prudent Bear
It is not the nature of dislocated markets to let fundamentals get in the way of price movement. Markets, after all, live on fear and greed. Sinking energy prices and a short squeeze ignited U.S. stocks this week. And surging stock prices always entice the optimistic viewpoint, with many viewing runs in stocks and the dollar as confirmation that the worst of the financial and economic crisis is behind us. The bursting of the so-called Energy/Commodities Bubble is also viewed in positive light.
Yet if the key dynamic is instead a Bursting Leveraged Speculating Community Bubble, entirely different dynamics are now in play. Enormous short positions have built up, the vast majority as part of “market neutral,” “quant” and myriad risk hedging strategies. If today’s dislocation develops into a significant unwind of these positions, the market immediately then becomes vulnerable to a disorderly “melt-up” followed almost inevitably by a sharp reversal and disorderly decline. The unwind of bearish speculations and hedges would be a most problematic market development, unleashing a final bout of speculative excess and disorder that would set the stage for a major market crisis.
It is now clear that many within the leveraged speculating community have suffered huge losses over the past few weeks. For a “community” that was already suffering a difficult year, blowups in the popular energy, commodities and short dollar trades were a decisive backbreaker. Huge rallies in heavily shorted stocks and sectors have added further pain. One can now expect major redemptions at quarter and year-ends, a dynamic that likely ensures recent near-chaotic market conditions become the norm for awhile.
Jim Puplava, Financial Sense
The US Mint has suspended the production of US Eagles. I was told by one dealer this morning, checking with him, they’re telling people delivery dates for silver Eagles won’t be till January, February of next year. One dealer I was talking to said that they can’t even get the plates – so what they were doing is they were ordering thousand ounce bars and they were melting the bars down to make one ounce coins because most people are buying either silver rounds – and I was told delivery dates right now are two months out. So this is August, probably late October. That’s how scarce it is. So, the other thing is get your physical metals because there is a gross discrepancy and divergence between trying to drive down the paper market price of silver. One dealer told me in July his sales were up four fold last year; and this month alone, his sales are up eight fold. One dealer was telling me today that he had never seen anything like this in his lifetime. On this Friday I just bought a ton of silver and I’ve been told it’s going to take two months to take delivery on that ton. And if the price goes lower, I’ll buy another ton. I’ve got a couple of dealers who store my bullion for me until it’s shipped overseas.
James Quinn, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
We have outsourced our savings to the emerging economies, along with our manufacturing jobs. The Chinese are saving the money we’ve paid them for flat screen TVs and the Middle Eastern countries are saving the money we’ve paid them for oil. You need savings in order to increase investment. The emerging markets are making the vast majority of the investments in the world. While the U.S. endlessly debates drilling and construction of nuclear plants (none built in U.S. since 1987) and oil refineries (none built in U.S. since 1977), China brought four oil refineries online in 2008 and plans to build 30 nuclear reactors in the next twelve years. The Asian Century has begun, but the U.S. has tried to keep up by using debt. It will not work. If anything, this has accelerated the shift of power to Asia.
Nouriel Roubini, RGE Monitor
Barron's: Unfortunately for the rest of us, you have a pretty good track record. How much more misery lies ahead?
Roubini: We are in the second inning of a severe, protracted recession, which started in the first quarter of this year and is going to last at least 18 months, through the middle of next year. A systemic banking crisis will go on for awhile, with hundreds of banks going belly up. The taxpayer's bill is going to be huge. I estimate this financial crisis will lead to credit losses of at least $1 trillion and most likely closer to $2 trillion. When I made this analysis in February everybody thought I was a lunatic. But a few weeks later the International Monetary Fund came out with an estimate of $945 billion, Goldman Sachs (GS) estimated $1.1 trillion and UBS (UBS) $1 trillion. Hedge-fund manager John Paulson recently estimated the losses would be $1.3 trillion, and late last month Bridgewater Associates came up with an estimate of $1.6 trillion. So, at this point $1 trillion isn't a ceiling, it's a floor. And the banks, as I've said, have written down only about $300 billion of subprime debt. I think $2 trillion is too high, but the number will definitely be huge.
Franklin Sanders, Money Changer
Either this is the greatest silver and gold buying opportunity of all time, or the end of a bull market.
But it is NOT the end of a bull market. Time alone argues that. A bull market runs 10 - 20 years, and this one has run only 7, since 2001. Those who think silver & gold have fallen into the "bursting of the commodity bubble" completely misunderstand what drives them in the first place. Silver & gold are not commodities; they are money. When investors pile into silver & gold, it's not any commodity bubble forcing them there, but monetary demand. They aren't buying metals because they think all the Indian ladies are going to be wearing two nose rings instead of one this season, or that the American bourgeoisie will suddenly begin stockpiling sterling silver forks again.
They are buying metals because -- listen to this, get it straight once & forever -- they distrust fiat central bank currencies (or if you prefer, national currencies). The dollar is trash, the yen is trash, the euro is trash; all are equally insolvent, equally unbacked by anything expect a politician's or central banker's promise, which is not nearly as good as that of any madame at any bordello anywhere.
The dollar is rising? So, why? Did it become better, acquire more gold backing, solve its chronic balance of payments deficit last night? Come on. Did the euro get worse overnight? The yen? How much worse could it get? You are seeing competitive devaluations, all very much worked out collegially in advance by central bankers. Fundamentally meaningless.
What is NOT meaningless is that the Great Alternative Currencies, silver & gold, have long been advancing against ALL national currencies. All markets swing like pendulums, too far one way, then too far the other. Silver & gold prices became overbought -- a lot of people short dollars were long silver & gold. The dollar rallied, oil & commodities fell, sucking down silver & gold money. Look at the numbers. Even with gold down to $787.50 today, that's only a 21.5% correction, while always more volatile silver is down 37.4%. Friends, these are normal, not outlandish, corrections. Sober up.
Julian D. W. Phillips, Gold Forecaster
The huge gap between the value of gold and the value of money must narrow. Whether it is through the rise in the value of gold and silver or through the fall of the value of money dictates the future of the financial system. Either way, gold and silver will prove to be the safe-haven it has been since money was part of man’s world. And the second half of this year is likely to be as dramatic as the first half but with a golden or silver sheen to it.
Steve Saville, Speculative Investor
Many people will be asking the question: why is the US$ rallying when its fundamentals are so terrible? From our perspective, however, a more reasonable question is: why has it taken so long for the US$ to rally against the euro given that the US$ is extremely under-valued relative to the euro and the euro's fundamentals are just as bad?
The answer, we think, is that the currency market has believed that the US Federal Reserve would be as 'easy' as it needed to be to help the banking system through its crisis, while the ECB would continue to focus on minimizing currency depreciation. We think the market was/is right to believe that the Fed will do whatever it takes to maintain the solvency of the major banks, but traders now appear to be coming around to the view that the ECB will also be loosening the monetary reins. Take away the interest-rate 'prop' and the euro suddenly becomes free to fall under the weight of its own over-valuation.
Mike Shedlock, Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis
It's NEVER "practical" for the Fed, the SEC, Banks, CEOs in general, the FDIC, Congress, the Treasury Department, or the President to tell the truth. This is what it all boils down to: Somehow it's never "practical" to stop a drunken credit-financed orgy, yet when the party ends, it's never "practical" to discuss the consequences. In this case, the credit orgy lasted so long, and there were so many players, that the most important truth right now that needs open, honest discussion is that the entire US Banking System Is Insolvent.
Government stupidity is the most liquid of all assets, spreading everywhere at the slightest provocation. Look for more of it and you won't be disappointed.
James Turk, Freemarket Gold and Money Report
The time-bomb is ticking. The federal government is liquid because as its consolidated accounts state, it has “the power to print additional currency.” And print it will for one simple reason. The federal government is insolvent. Its debt obligations far exceed its financial capacity to repay those debts without debasing the dollar. Eventually it will take one ounce of gold or so to buy the Dow Jones Industrial Average. At that time I will recommend selling gold and buying the DJIA to ride the next cycle. But the DJIA still has to lose about 90% of its price in terms of gold for that to happen.
Christopher Whalen, Institutional Risk Analyst
We're not sure who's going to win the presidency in November, but we are very sure that the safety and soundness of the nation's banking system is going to be an issue in this election - perhaps as prominent an issue as energy prices. Indeed, we think that the president-elect will be forced to meet with President George Bush and both men will ask the Congress to move on providing funding and new legal authority to backstop the FDIC. In the near-term Uncle Sam is going to be forced to get even more involved to head off a catastrophic contraction in the availability of credit to the private economy.
Jim Willie, Hat Trick Letter
The US banks are fast approaching the early warning season in early to middle September. They are required (Wall Street firms excluded) to come forward and provide guidance on their earnings, their balance sheet damage (called impairment, since sounds better), and their profits (nonexistent, as in extinct). Wall Street firms have almost no stock or bond issuance, no private equity packaging, so business is largely dominated by management of their demise, along with management of their propaganda messages that seem shrill lately. The US banks will in my estimation announce bigger Q3 losses than Q2. Their BS-stories continue since they are actively seeking cash to shore up balance sheets. Their mortgage related losses will be ongoing, but now those losses will be joined by prime mortgage losses, commercial loan losses, car loan losses, credit card losses, and more. The USGovt can claim the economy is in good shape, that exports are booming, but a grand disconnect has occurred. Something like 460 thousand jobs have been lost this year, and most job gains are on paper, from the Birth Death Model nonsense. More paper deception, this of the labor market. Consumers might spend less if they were keenly aware of US-based unemployment running over 14%. The steep decline in USGovt tax receipts testifies to a recession. Most statistics testify to recession, like the Leading Economic Indicators. Reverse gear for the USEconomy is bad news for the USDollar. And all the horrendous disasters coming from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac acid pits cannot be good.